LOG IN
    SELECT A PUBLICATION:
Florida Law Weekly
FLW Supplement
FLW Federal
User Name:
Password:
 


CONTACT
    Toll-free: 800-351-0917
    E-mail us
    Submit Opinions

PLACE AN ORDER
    Print Editions
    Online Editions
    Bound Volumes
    2/24-Hour Online Access


OUR PUBLICATIONS
    Florida Law Weekly
    FLW Supplement
    FLW Federal
    Collected Cases
    Sample FLW Online


RESEARCH
    Cross Citations
    Week In Review
    Rule Revisions
    Review Granted
    Current Issue Index
     Civil Section
     Criminal Section
    2024 Cumulative Index
     Civil Section
     Criminal Section
    Public Reprimands
    Florida Statutes
    Helpful Links



  
New Cases
A cumulative listing of headnotes for opinions appearing in the next issue of The Florida Law Weekly. A link to each opinion is provided.

This area is cleared when the upcoming issue is finalized and uploaded. New cases will appear here as they are processed. Cases formerly appearing in this area comprise the current issue section (including recent Supreme Court cases), and will still be available for review at another link.

Subscribers will also be able to search our New Releases section of unedited cases recently posted.

Note: Any links denoting original opinion citations
will not be active in this sample area.


Added on Tuesday, September 23

Workers' compensation -- Employer/servicing agent's failure to timely file a notice of denial of compensability was not procedural default, and did not forfeit their rights to contest compensability
ALACHUA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and PALMER & CAY/CARSWELL, Appellants, v. EMANUEL STARLING, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Jurors -- Peremptory challenges -- Absence of defendant
EDDIE JOHN ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Juveniles -- Sentencing -- Error to reject Department of Juvenile Justice recommendation of community control and to impose moderate risk commitment without first obtaining recommendation from Department as to restrictiveness level -- Error to enter single order of adjudication and of post commitment community control applicable to all offenses -- Error to fail to state duration of commitment and of post commitment community control -- No merit to contention that errors were not preserved for appellate review -- Section 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996), does not apply to juvenile delinquency proceedings -- Question certified
A.L.W., A CHILD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Double jeopardy -- Appeal from conviction and sentence for assault and burglary with assault of same victim during same incident -- Double jeopardy violation is fundamental error permitting review of such claim on appeal as to both convictions and sentences -- Perrin v. State, Graham v. State, Kio v. State, and Salgat v. State, receded from, to extent they hold that only legality of sentences, but not convictions, may be raised for first time on appeal -- Silence, by itself, does not demonstrate free and knowing waiver of double jeopardy claim, either as to conviction or sentence -- Defendant's conviction and sentence for assault vacated -- Case remanded for correction of scrivener's error
TIMOTHY AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Licensing -- Board of Pilot Commissioners -- Remanded with directions that Board determine whether pilot's violation of statute by executing inappropriate rudder order, standing alone, as opposed to an inappropriate rudder order in conjunction with a late turn, warrants revocation of license
THOMAS A. BAGGETT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee. 1st District.

Administrative law -- Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes -- In revoking prior registration order involving parcels of subdivided land, Division erroneously relied on general cease and desist statute rather than more specific revocation statute which contains more stringent criteria -- Due process rights were violated where charging notices failed to allege, and final order failed to include findings which would support revocation of registration orders under revocation statute
B.D.M. FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Community control revocation -- Jurisdiction -- Necessary condition precedent to a conclusion that revocation process has been set in motion is a finding that an arrest warrant has been issued -- Fact that an affidavit has been signed, by itself, not sufficient to support conclusion that revocation process has been set in motion -- Arrest warrant is not issued for purposes of setting revocation process in motion until it has been delivered to the appropriate county sheriff for execution -- Once defendant raised issue of trial court's jurisdiction, burden was on state to establish that revocation had been timely commenced -- Where state failed to establish that arrest warrant had been delivered to sheriff for execution before defendant's probationary term had expired, affidavit alleging violation of community control must be dismissed and defendant is entitled to discharge -- Question certified: When an arrest warrant is signed by a judge based upon an affidavit alleging a violation of probation or community control, is delivery of the warrant to the appropriate county sheriff for execution a necessary condition precedent to commencement of the revocation proceeding for the purpose of determining whether the proceeding has been commenced before the expiration of probation or community control?
RICHARD K. BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Workers' compensation -- Hearings -- De novo -- Illegible transcript -- Cause remanded for hearing de novo, where court reporters were unable to transcribe portions of testimony and agreed that it was impossible to prepare a proper transcript
CALVIN'S HEAVY EQUIPMENT, INC. and AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants, v. DWIGHT JEROME KIRKLAND, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Appeals -- Imposition of adult sanctions pursuant to section 39.059(7) on a child prosecuted as an adult is not strictly a juvenile proceeding, but is in the nature of a hybrid procedure -- Provisions of Criminal Appeal Reform Act, requiring preservation of issues for appeal, applies to sentencing of juveniles as adults -- Application of act does not obviate right to appeal guaranteed in section 39.059(7), but requires that any such error be preserved -- Juveniles sentenced as adult in criminal proceedings not only required to preserve error for review, but afforded opportunity to do so, pursuant to Rule 3.800(b) -- Defendant's claim that trial court erred in imposing departure sentence not subject to appellate review where he was sentenced as adult after effective date of Criminal Appeal Reform Act, and had the opportunity to preserve error, but failed to do so
RICO L. CARGLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Evidence -- Error to permit prosecution to permit expert testimony that alleged child victim exhibited symptoms consistent with those of child suffering from child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome -- Error not harmless under circumstances where jury had announced deadlock and was only able to reach verdict after being given Allen charge
WALTER DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Probation -- Condition -- Error to impose condition that defendant pay public defender's lien without advising defendant of right to hearing to contest amount
KELVIN LAMAR DUNN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Administrative law -- Medicaid -- Agency for Health Care Administration required to explicate emerging policy of requiring mental health services provider to have annual contract with Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health program office, rather than simply any form of contract with Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, where it only began imposing requirement when it sent Medicaid cancellation letter to provider -- Testimony of AHCA and HRS officials, and prior orders of agency which did not establish that AHCA consistently construed statute as requiring providers to have annual contracts with ADM, and which contained no acknowledgement that ADM requirement was incipient policy, did not provide means for AHCA to evade requirement that agency explicate incipient policy in hearing -- Final order canceling Medicaid provider number reversed, and case remanded for purpose of permitting AHCA to explain its incipient policy, or for AHCA to remand for further proceedings
EXCLUSIVE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANTS, INC., d/b/a NEW DIRECTION COUNSELING, a Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent/Appellee. 1st District.

Mandamus -- Department of Corrections -- Where prisoner exhausted administrative grievance process within Department and filed mandamus petition with circuit court alleging Department committed several errors in its disciplinary report against him, circuit court erred in dismissing petition based on finding that it lacked jurisdiction and that petition should have been filed in district court of appeal -- Remand to permit trial court to consider petition
PHILLIP DYLAN HOLLAND, Appellant, v. HARRY K. SINGLETARY, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Second degree murder -- Although trial court erred in denying request for jury instruction on defense of voluntary intoxication of defendant charged with first-degree murder, error was harmless where defendant was convicted of second-degree murder -- Although instruction may have influenced jury to find defendant could not have formed specific intent to commit first-degree murder, instruction could not have legally influenced jury's deliberations regarding lesser included offense of second-degree murder, which requires proof only of general intent
JOE NATHAN JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Workers' compensation -- Temporary total disability and medical benefits payable through date on which judge of compensation claims found claimant reached maximum medical improvement -- Finding that claimant had no work restrictions once maximum medical improvement was attained vacated
D.R. KING, Appellant, v. SCOTTY'S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Appellee. 1st District.

Administrative law -- Forfeiture of rights and benefits under Florida Retirement System -- Appeal from order of Division of Retirement forfeiting all rights and benefits under Florida Retirement System due retired sheriff, who was charged in five count indictment, and pled guilty to charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice, as result of negotiated plea -- No error in finding that sheriff committed acts with willful intent to defraud public of right to receive faithful performance of his duties as public officer -- No merit to argument that what sheriff did was unrelated to position as sheriff, and that it was not demonstrated, as required by statute, that he was convicted of felony by which he realized or attempted to realize advantage through use or attempted use of his office -- Sheriff admitted he was guilty of charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice, and agreed that he tried to prevent suspect from cooperating with law enforcement, so suspect would not communicate knowledge about sheriff's participation in underlying marijuana conspiracy -- Sheriff had statutory duty to cooperate with enforcement of laws, and instead provided information to drug traffickers regarding confidential law enforcement efforts, counseled others to misrepresent facts, and was involved in delivery of funds for suspect's attorney's fees -- Acts committed by sheriff in furtherance of offense were inseparably intertwined with his position as sheriff -- Acts set forth in federal indictment and in factual basis to plea agreement satisfy elements of tampering with witness or informant, a third degree felony under Florida law, a conviction for which would be grounds for forfeiture of retirement benefits, and not conspiracy to tamper with a witness
JOE NEWMANS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, Appellee. 1st District.

Jurisdiction -- Action against foreign shipowner for failure to provide maintenance and cure -- Defendant's contacts with Florida, consisting of port stops at direction of ship's charterer, engaging husbanding agents, soliciting Florida employee through a nonresident union, telephoning party when he was in Florida, and maintenance of an escrow account in state, do not satisfy requirements for specific personal jurisdiction -- Such activities do not satisfy the connexity or causal connection requirement of specific personal jurisdiction because plaintiff's suit does not arise out of or relate to defendant's contacts with Florida
OCEAN CHEMICAL TRANSPORT, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. ROBIN M. COTTON, Appellee. 1st District.

Public utilities -- Public Service Commission did not err in expanding wastewater service territory of privately held utility, despite city's argument that expansion was inconsistent with validly approved comprehensive plan -- PSC correctly applied requirements of statute, where statute's plain language only required PSC to consider comprehensive plan, and expressly granted discretion in decision of whether to defer to plan -- Order plainly demonstrated that PSC considered city's comprehensive plan
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, Appellant, v. SUSAN F. CLARK, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Appellees. 1st District.

Workers' compensation -- Expert medical advisors -- Judge of compensation claims erred in denying employer's request that claimant be evaluated by an expert medical advisor and in awarding permanent total disability benefits where claimant's mental health care providers disagreed about whether or to what extent industrial accident was responsible for claimant's psychological condition, whether or to what extent industrial accident had resulted in permanent psychological impairment, and whether or to what extent claimant's condition was disabling -- JCC erroneously found motion for appointment of expert medical advisor to be untimely -- Party who has complied fully with all pretrial orders should not be foreclosed from requesting evaluation by an expert medical advisor when request is made with reasonable promptness once a conflict in health care providers' opinions surfaces -- Requirements of statute providing for evaluation by expert medical advisor are mandatory and not directory
PALM SPRINGS GENERAL HOSPITAL and FLORIDA RETAIL FEDERATION SIF, Appellants, v. EDUARDO CABRERA, Appellee. 1st District.

Attorney's fees -- Administrative law -- Public Employees Relations Commission did not abuse discretion in denying attorney's fees to Department of Corrections chaplain, whose discipline was reduced from dismissal to 60 day suspension by Commission -- Chaplain challenged dismissal on ground that employer had no just cause to discipline him at all, and although he did establish that department failed to prove misconduct in regard to one of three charges, he did not prevail as to remaining charges, and dismissal was mitigated to suspension only because of long and exemplary employment history
DAVID PIPPING, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Post conviction relief -- Plea -- Voluntariness -- Remand for evidentiary hearing or attachment of portions of record which conclusively show that defendant is entitled to no relief on his claim that his plea was involuntary
ALPHONSO SWAIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Speedy trial -- Trial court's extension of speedy trial period for exceptional circumstances did not amount to abuse of discretion under circumstances where prosecutor sent defendant's blood samples to laboratory for DNA testing within sufficient period of time to permit completion of testing before expiration of speedy trial period if laboratory personnel had been in position to begin testing promptly upon receipt of samples, inability of laboratory personnel to commence testing immediately because laboratory was off-line was not fault of prosecutor, and by the time the prosecutor learned that laboratory had been off-line for many weeks and had done no testing on the samples, it was, as defense counsel conceded, too late for any laboratory to complete the testing within speedy trial period
LARRY WESTBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Contempt -- Direct criminal contempt -- Reversible error to omit from written order the factual basis for judgment of contempt and to fail to afford defendant opportunity to show cause as to why he should not be held in contempt on first of two contempt charges -- Trial court may punish direct contempt summarily -- Governing rule requires that written judgment contain recital of facts on which adjudication of guilt is based and that trial court give defendant opportunity to present evidence of mitigating circumstances -- Omission from written order of factual basis for contempt judgment constitutes reversible error -- Rule does not require that defendant be appointed counsel to represent him in defense of direct criminal contempt charges or that formal hearing be held
DOYLE WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Correction -- Appeals -- Trial court erroneously represented that defendant could appeal order denying his motion to modify or mitigate sentence within thirty days -- Order not appealable
JOSHUA T. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Unemployment compensation -- Voluntary termination of employment without good cause attributable to employer
STEVEN J. BERTHE, Appellant, v. GEORGE G. and DAVIE FRESE and FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Post conviction relief -- Nolo contendere plea -- Voluntariness -- Error to summarily deny motion alleging that trial court failed to inform defendant of consequences of being sentenced as habitual offender when he entered his nolo contendere pleas without attaching portions of record refuting claim -- Although transcript of plea hearing indicated court informed defendant of maximum habitual offender term he could receive for the charged offenses, court was required to inform defendant of effect habitualization would have on gaintime, provisional credits, and eligibility for early release -- Remand for further proceedings
DARON TAREE BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Evidence -- Motion in limine -- Violation of order -- Where a party makes a successful motion in limine, but then fails to make a contemporaneous objection to evidence submitted in violation of order in limine, alleged error will not be preserved for appellate review -- Where defendant's motion in limine to exclude any testimony from any law enforcement officer that would indicate officer knew defendant from prior contacts or violations of law was granted, and testimony was presented in violation of order in limine, because defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection when testimony was offered, issue was not preserved for appeal
TYRONE D. COFFEE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Costs -- Mandatory -- Trial court erred by failing to include in its written order citation to proper statutory authority for court costs imposed -- Although mandatory court costs of up to $253 may be imposed without orally announcing the statutory authority at sentencing hearing, written order must cite proper statutory authority -- Attorney's fees -- Error to impose attorney's fees without advising defendant of right to contest amount -- Defendant has 30 days to file written objection and if filed, lien must be stricken and a new lien may be imposed after notice and hearing
JEREMY GERALD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Search and seizure -- Record supports trial court's oral denial of motion to suppress contraband found during initial search of main portion of defendant's residence on ground that defendant consented to search, and further supports suppression of contraband found after defendant told officers to get a warrant -- Written order to be corrected to conform to oral pronouncement -- State's claim that inevitable discovery rule should have been applied not considered on appeal where claim was not presented to trial court
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY J. HUNTON, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Error to impose public defender's lien without advising defendant of right to contest amount of lien -- Remand without prejudice to reimpose the lien upon compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1)
CORREY HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Probation revocation -- Split sentence -- Credit for time served -- Time served on probation -- Split sentence of fourteen and one-half years imposed upon revocation of defendant's probation was illegal because, when combined with the ten months defendant had previously served on probation, the combination of new sanctions exceeded the fifteen year statutory maximum for underlying offense
OSCAR JOLLY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Scheme to defraud -- Grand theft -- Convictions arising out of high-pressure sale of dance lessons at dance studios -- Although there was no direct evidence of defendant's involvement in high-pressure selling which formed basis for scheme to defraud and grand thefts, involvement was sufficient that he must have had knowledge of the tactics employed at dance studios -- Evidence sufficient to support conviction for scheme to defraud -- Sentencing -- Guidelines -- Departure -- Disagreement with level of punishment offered by guidelines and finding that crimes were perpetrated with heightened degree of premeditation not valid reasons for departure -- Evidence insufficient to support departure based on emotional trauma to victims -- Number of victims and time over which crime was committed are factors inherent in scheme to defraud and are not valid reasons for departure -- Defenselessness of victims not valid reason for departure in view of victims' testimony that they knew they were not required to purchase the lessons and knew that they had right to cancel contracts, which all contained three-day cancellation provision -- Efforts to gain victims' confidence in order to convince them to purchase dance lessons not type of fiduciary relationship or near fiduciary relationship which would support departure for breach of trust -- Use of agents and employees to increase number of victims was factor inherent in offense of conviction where, as charged and argued to jury, defendant's guilt was dependent upon state's proof that those employed by dance studios were committing fraud and that defendant should be held responsible -- Protection of public and age of victims not valid reasons for departure under circumstances -- Remand for resentencing within guidelines
JAMES A. KIPPING, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.


Added on Monday, September 22

Civil procedure -- Costs -- Expert witness fees -- Trial court abused its discretion in awarding fees for expert witnesses who did not testify at underlying civil trial and who were not deposed -- Administrative appeal filing fee -- No rule or statute permits recovery of costs incurred in an administrative appeal that was not part of the civil action -- Fee plaintiff paid to pursue an administrative appeal of county's denial of its application for tent permit was not an expense incurred in prosecuting civil action, because circuit court was not acting in appellate capacity to review administrative hearing examiner's ruling
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. GALAXY FIREWORKS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Habitual offender -- Error to classify defendant as habitual violent felony offender without substantiated proof of prison release date -- Defense counsel's general statements that defendant could be classified as habitual offender did not waive duty of trial court to make specific findings on record that defendant met requirements for habitualization -- Because defendant did not object to habitualization on grounds that court did not have sufficient evidence of release date, state to be afforded opportunity on remand to present substantiated proof of prison release date
KENNETH LOWENTHAL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Trial court erred in imposing a public defender's lien without advising defendant that lien would be imposed and that he had a right to contest amount of lien -- Probation -- Conditions -- Error to impose condition requiring monthly payment to First Step without citation to statutory authority
ALVIN E. MARTINI, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Plea -- Withdrawal -- Trial court in refusing to honor defendant's plea agreement should have given defendant opportunity to withdraw pleas -- Remanded for trial court to allow defendant to withdraw his pleas
DAN B. MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Wrongful death -- Workers' compensation immunity
MARIA NELSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan O. Nelson, Deceased, Appellant, v. U.S. AGRI-CHEMICALS CORPORATION, Appellee. 2nd District.

Estates -- Attorney's fees -- Statute requires petitioner for attorney's fees to give informal notice to personal representative and to all persons who would be impacted by award and allows attorney to apply for these fees at any time during the pendency of the estate -- Trial court erred in denying petition to tax litigation attorney's fees against estate for legal fees incurred in contesting probate of will procured by exercise of undue influence, even though entitlement to attorney's fees was not pled in initial pleading filed in probate -- Trial court directed to grant petition and to determine from which part of estate fees should be paid
In re: Estate of Marjorie Paris, a/k/a Marjorie White Paris, CARL E. LINDENMAYER, SR., Appellant, v. KATHRYN M. HARPER, Appellee. 2nd District.

Torts -- Medical malpractice -- Limitation of actions -- Conflict of laws -- Significant relationship -- Where both plaintiff and defendant were West Virginia residents at time of alleged malpractice, injury occurred in West Virginia, and physician-patient relationship began and ended in West Virginia, West Virginia statute of limitations is applicable -- Conflict certified -- Question certified: Does the significant relationship test adopted in Bates v. Cook, 509 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1987), for use in applying Florida's borrowing statute, section 95.10, Florida Statutes, also apply to cases involving Florida's statute of limitations, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes?
CARRIE HARGIS ROBINSON, an infant under the age of eighteen years who sues by her mother and next friend, SHIRLEY HARGIS, Appellants, v. LEROY H. MERKLE, JR., as personal representative of the ESTATE OF CARMELO L. TERLIZZI, M.D., deceased, Appellee. 2nd District.

Arbitration -- Arbitrable issues -- Where count of complaint claiming breach of joint venture agreement was dismissed on ground that agreement contained clause requiring parties to submit any dispute over terms of agreement to arbitration, plaintiffs subsequently filed demand for arbitration, and defendants filed counterclaim in arbitration proceedings alleging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and interference with business relationship, trial court erred in referring issue of arbitrability of counterclaim to arbitration panel -- Where agreement did not contain language authorizing arbitration panel to decide arbitrability issue, court must determine whether counterclaim is subject to arbitration -- Error to deny emergency motion to determine that issues raised in counterclaim were not subject to arbitration
THOMAS ROMANO and ROBERT HEYM, Appellants, v. GOODLETTE OFFICE PARK, LTD., SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH MEDICAL BUILDING I, LTD., and GULFSHORE LAND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Appellees. 2nd District.

Receivership -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Error to appoint receiver where mortgagee failed to establish waste or any other basis for receivership -- Appointment of receiver is not matter of right even if mortgage so provides and contains an assignment of rents clause -- In deciding whether to enforce mortgage provision for appointment of receiver, trial court must balance mortgagor's right to own and possess its property against interests of mortgagee in protecting its security in property -- Mortgagor was not required to establish that value of property was greater than mortgage debt where all rental income was being applied to the debt -- Alternative methods existed to protect mortgagee's security interest without depriving mortgagor of its right of possession, including enforcing assignment of rents clause and requiring mortgagor to deposit rents into registry of court
THE SEASONS PARTNERSHIP I, a Florida general partnership, Appellant, v. KRAUS-ANDERSON, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation, Appellee. 2nd District.

Creditors' rights -- Fraudulent transfers -- Where funds derived from sale of homestead property and other funds jointly held by husband and wife were deposited in account established pursuant to escrow agreement, and funds from that account were subsequently transferred to a seller of a residence that was titled solely in the name of the wife, trial court erred in finding that escrow agreement failed to establish a tenancy by the entireties in the escrowed funds and that amount transferred for purchase of property titled solely in name of wife was a fraudulent transfer -- Error to find that escrow agreement failed to establish a tenancy by the entireties because it failed to provide a statement of permission for one spouse to act for the other -- Fact that funds are held in escrow to be withdrawn by the escrow agent only at the direction of both husband and wife does not preclude the existence of an entireties estate in the funds
GEORGE E. SNYDER and KAREN E. SNYDER, Appellants, v. VIRGINIA DINARDO, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Consecutive sentences -- Trial court erred when it ordered defendant's sentence to run consecutively to any sentence to be imposed in pending case -- Probation -- Conditions -- Condition stating that defendant's sentence for aggravated battery runs consecutive to any VOP or conditional release from incarceration in foreign state stricken -- Condition requiring defendant to pay for substance evaluation stricken
TROY TREMAINE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Order -- Written order must be corrected to conform to court's oral pronouncement
RAFAEL ALVAREZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Criminal law -- Double jeopardy -- Trial court erred in declaring mistrial over defendant's objection after trial court, without inquiry, excused a juror who had admitted to having a couple of beers at lunch and defendant refused to proceed with five-person jury -- Manifest necessity for mistrial not demonstrated where there was no inquiry into precise condition of allegedly impaired juror
JULIO BAEZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Criminal law -- Discovery -- Reciprocal discovery -- Order permitting defendant to withdraw demand for discovery, and denying State's motion to compel reciprocal discovery is reversed
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. CLIFTON CLAYTON BOGGESS, Respondent. 3rd District.

Contracts -- Leases -- Torts -- Economic loss rule -- Exceptions -- Damage to other property -- Trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of lessor on lessee's claim that lessor was negligent in selecting contractor responsible for making improvements to leased premises, based upon determination that any duty imposed upon lessor to hire competent contractor to fulfill terms of lease agreement was duty stemming from that agreement -- Lessor's alleged breach of building code does not constitute exception to economic loss rule where damages sought were no different from those that could have been asserted in action for breach of lease agreement -- Damage to lessee's business computers did not fall within ``other property'' exception to economic loss rule -- Lessee's computers were fundamentally related to commercial endeavor contemplated by the bargained-for lease and build-out agreement, and damage to computers during construction was proper subject of risk allocation pursuant to lease negotiations -- Lessee's failure to contend with those risks during negotiation process cannot be remedied by tort action
COMPTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, vs. MILAM COMMERCE PARK, LTD., a Florida limited partnership and D & M MODELING, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, Appellees. 3rd District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Remand for entry of written order reflecting decision to impose adult sanctions on defendant, who was juvenile at time of offense
DARNELL CUTRI, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Child custody -- Visitation -- Grandparents -- Statute providing for reasonable grandparent visitation rights where one or both parents of child are deceased and where such visitation is found to be in child's best interests is constitutional -- Statute is narrowly tailored to promote state's compelling interest in protecting children after parent has died by preserving grandparent visitation that is in child's best interests and contains inherent safeguards which protect fundamental rights of parents -- Finding that visitation by paternal grandparents was in best interests of child supported by competent substantial evidence, including evidence that child's mother had died, her father had remarried and was in process of divorcing child's adoptive mother, child's father no longer lived in child's home, and child was being cared for by her adoptive mother -- Order was overly broad in that it allowed grandparents to mandate child's religious development by permitting extended visitation every other Friday evening for Sabbath dinner in addition to numerous specific religious holidays -- Court has additional reservations concerning whether frequent dinners and visits are warranted where trial court found parents to be fit and testimony revealed that frequent visits would be destructive to child's normal pattern of living -- Question certified: May state constitutionally allow reasonable grandparent visitation where one or both parents of child are deceased and visitation is determined to be in best interests of child
PHILIP GOODE VON EIFF and CHERYL GOODE VON EIFF, Appellants, v. LEONOR AZICRI and ROBERTO AZICRI, Appellees. 3rd District.

Unemployment compensation -- Record supported finding that claimant voluntarily quit job for personal reasons, disqualifying him from unemployment compensation benefits
AHMED A. MUSAWA, Appellant, vs. BRUMLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. and THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellees. 3rd District.

Unemployment compensation -- Claimant's refusal to ``work with owner's wife'' did not amount to misconduct disqualifying him from unemployment compensation benefits
ALFREDO PION, Appellant, vs. MIAMI PAPER & PLASTIC, INC. and THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellees. 3rd District.

Estates -- Torts -- Conspiracy -- Wills -- Evidence insufficient to establish existence of a conspiracy to deprive decedent of money and assets during her lifetime through undue influence and/or breach of fiduciary duty -- Evidence that decedent's sister telephoned her son and asked him to render assistance to decedent after decedent's husband had died not sufficient to establish conspiracy -- Error to find bank negligent for hiring, retention, and supervision of two employees where that claim was neither pled nor tried by consent -- Failure to object to evidence that bank failed to supervise and train two employees cannot be construed as implicit consent to try an unpled theory when the evidence was relevant to issue of bank's breach of fiduciary duty to decedent, an issue which was being properly tried -- Wills -- Lower court erred in admitting earlier will into probate after concluding that most recent will was void due to decedent's lack of testamentary capacity and/or nephew's undue influence -- Finding that decedent lacked requisite testamentary capacity to execute most recent will was erroneous as matter of law where, although physician opined that decedent suffered from severe dementia which would progressively worsen and that her judgment was significantly impaired on date of examination, physician categorically testified that he was unable to offer any opinion as to decedent's testamentary capacity at any time; will contestant offered no evidence that decedent was incompetent or not lucid at time she made last will; and evidence adduced at trial was contrary to finding of lack of testamentary capacity -- Undue influence -- Although nephew was substantial beneficiary under challenged will and did not contest fact that he enjoyed confidential relationship with decedent during her final years, evidence was insufficient to establish that he was active in procurement of will -- Record does not support lower court's finding that nephew procured attorney for decedent or that nephew was even familiar with the attorney who prepared contested will, but instead indicated that attorney was randomly selected from yellow pages by virtue of his proximity to decedent and his specialty -- Evidence did not establish that nephew gave any instructions to attorney as to preparation of challenged will, nor was there any evidence that nephew had knowledge of dispositive provisions of decedent's proposed final will -- Nephew was not present at execution of challenged will, all witnesses to execution of will were independently procured by attorney, and nephew did not see or take possession of documents after decedent executed them -- Even if presumption of undue influence properly arose, presumption was rebutted by reasonable explanation that decedent changed will in aftermath of bitter dispute with former beneficiary over the proceeds of a treasury bill which decedent believed beneficiary had wrongfully misappropriated and refused to return to decedent -- Remand with instructions that decedent's last executed will and amendment thereto be admitted to probate
MANUEL RAIMI, individually and as Co-Personal Representative and Trustee of the EVELYN S. GRUBER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT and EVELYN S. GRUBER REVOCABLE TRUST both dated July 8, 1994; RENEE RAIMI and FRIEDA PANTZER, SUNTRUST f/k/a SUNBANK/MIAMI, N.A.; THERESA HEIDEL, Individually and as an officer of SUNBANK/MIAMI, N.A., LUCILLE CLUM, Individually and as Vice President and Trust Officer of SUNBANK/MIAMI, N.A.; IDA RAIMI and EDWARD L. SCHULTZ, Appellants, v. ESTELLE G. FURLONG, Appellee. 3rd District.

Criminal law -- Aggravated stalking -- Battery -- Where prior inconsistent statements of victim and her son were the only substantive evidence of guilt, convictions cannot be sustained
BRYANT WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Criminal law -- Habeas Corpus -- Bond -- Writ of habeas corpus granted where trial judge failed to state with specificity facts on which she revoked defendant's bond and her reasons therefor -- While defendant's failure to appear for status conference and arrest on new charges similar to that for which he was on release may have supported revocation of bond and pretrial detention, trial court was obligated to recite facts on which revocation of bond and commitment were based, and to determine conditions of release, if any -- State failed to meet burden of adducing evidence showing beyond a reasonable doubt that pretrial detention was necessary because no conditions can be crafted to satisfy public interest
KENT DUPREE, Petitioner, v. RON COCHRAN, as Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, Respondent. 4th District.

Mandamus -- Trial court directed to order Department of Corrections to vacate and expunge disciplinary report and restore gain time or conduct another evidentiary hearing where department failed to produce cassette tape containing verbal order prisoner was accused of violating -- Record devoid of evidence on which department could rely to support its determination that prisoner was ordered not to do that which he was accused of doing -- If another hearing is held, department must either produce tape or show good and valid cause for failure to do so
ARTHUR F. GIORDANO, Appellant, v. FRED DIXON, Superintendent, Appellee. 4th District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Guidelines -- Departure -- Youthful offender -- Trial court erred in sentencing defendant to upward departure from sentencing guidelines, where recommended guidelines sentence was less than maximum youthful offender sentence, and trial court gave no valid reason for upward departure -- Where guidelines sentence is less than maximum youthful offender sentence, trial court must sentence within guidelines, or give valid reason for upward departure -- Youthful offender sentence not valid reason for upward departure -- Where trial court was under erroneous impression that sentencing guidelines had no bearing on youthful offender sentence, and thus was unaware it was imposing departure sentence, trial court may resentence defendant within sentencing guidelines or provide valid written reason for departure -- Notation on guidelines scoresheet that youthful offender was a mitigating circumstance considered a clerical error where trial court orally pronounced that defendant could be sentenced to more time if he was sentenced as a youthful offender ``because the guidelines don't apply''
CLIFTON MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.

Contempt -- Order -- Specification of conduct constituting contempt -- Temporary injunction fails to identify the clinical study and its supporting documentation with adequate specificity to support contempt order
MATTHIAS RATH, M.D. and HEALTH NOW, INC., Appellants, v. NETWORK MARKETING, L.C., n/k/a REXALL SHOWCASE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee. 4th District.

Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Correction -- Illegal sentence -- Probation revocation -- Credit for time served -- Case remanded for trial court to review the record to determine whether defendant had already served the statutory maximum time on probation when the affidavit of violation of probation was filed against him, and if it does, then to vacate the prison sentence and discharge defendant -- Where probationer, due to failure to credit him with prior probation served, is sentenced to probationary term that exceeds statutory maximum and is serving the illegal portion of that term when an affidavit of violation is filed, affidavit should be dismissed because trial court's jurisdiction over the probation expired when maximum probationary term had been served
HERBERT WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.

Contracts -- Construction -- Arbitration -- Where contract provided for arbitration of disputes arising under or related to the parties' agreement or to the property, which included land and improvements, trial court erred in refusing to require arbitration of claims relating to placement and function of air conditioning system which allegedly picked up carbon monoxide emissions from car left running in garage and sent them through house, thereby killing husband
U. S. HOME CORPORATION, Appellant, v. PATRICIA SEIFERT, etc., et al., Appellees. 5th District.